DO THE BENEFITS OUTWEIGH THE HARMS?

As digitalization and AI spiral out of control in an ever-expanding web of technology gone rogue, perhaps it’s time to consider whether the harms outweigh the hoped for and hyped about benefits.

Will cell towers and antennas permeating our cities, thousands of satellites filling our skies, and an ocean teeming with technology make for more fulfilling lives? Will the internet of things, smart cities, smart dust, transhumanism, and billions of sensors, cameras, facial recognition technology and other forms of biometrics squeezing from our world every “byte” of data imaginable, provide overall benefit or harm to our infinitely fine-tuned web of life? And will an algorithmically-generated and controlled world help bring about fulfullment, thriving, and peace?

Below is a brief overview of why more and more people around the world are questioning the wisdom of our mass migration into cyber space enabled by a hyper-technologized world.

NB: Please see Microwaving Our Planet for a more in-depth discussion of satellites and Smart Ocean: Impacts of technology on marine life for more on oceans.

In 1987, Robert O. Becker, orthopedic surgeon, researcher in bioelectricity and biocybernetics, and well-known author of The Body Electric wrote:

This use of EM energy for power and communications has markedly accelerated since the end of World War II and we have now just about filled up the available space in the EM spectrum. This change in our natural environment is actually the most drastic alteration made by mankind and is far greater than any chemical contamination yet produced. This was done in the complete confidence, based upon the “thermal-effects-only” dogma, that no biological effects or actual harm to living things could occur. We now know that this was wrong. All living things are closely tied to the frequencies of our natural EM environment and the presence of abnormal, man-made fields produces serious alterations in basic life functions.

Dr. Becker’s words were not heeded by governments, regulatory agencies, standard setting bodies, and the military industrial complex. For the last twenty-seven years, we humans have immersed all life in a massive biological experiment without informed consent, and with credible scientific evidence indicating this ubiquitous exposure to pulsed electromagnetic radiation will prove harmful to health and potentially fatal to some.

Once 4G/5G antennas are densely installed in communities around the globe and interacting with tens of thousands of satellites polluting our skies and a world full of internet connected sensors, cameras, cellphones, and a host of other data-harvesting technologies, no one will be able to escape continuous, involuntary exposure to these artificial electromagnetic fields. Though all living beings are affected, the unborn child, young children, the elderly, and people with chronic illnesses, EHS, or compromised immune systems are particularly vulnerable.

The 2015 International EMF Scientist Appeal. signed by more than 240 scientists with published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of wireless radiation states:

Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life

The International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF), a commission dedicated to “ensuring the protection of humans and other species from the harmful effects of non-ionizing radiation” states:

  • RFR has been proven to damage biological systems at intensities below the ICNIRP and FCC guidelines. 
  • Public exposure to RFR is already harmful and will rise with the deployment of 5G.
  • Exposure is unavoidable, contravening International Human Rights Acts and ethical codes of practice, such as the U.N. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights to “Protect, Respect and Remedy”.
  • Almost all international governmental health advisory groups are biased on conflicts of interests.

The dramatic transformation of our world into a digitalized for profit market place is particularly harmful to children. The International Declaration on the Human Rights of Children in the Digital Age, launched November 2023, states:

The growing number of wireless devices in and near homes, schools, daycare centers, and workplaces, together with supporting infrastructure, is increasing children’s continuous and cumulative radiation exposure from: cell phones, laptops, tablets, computers, routers, gaming consoles, wearables, internet of things, smart meters, robots, small cell and macro towers, satellite base stations. 

The Declaration calls on government officials to establish health-based NIR [Non Ionizing Radiation] exposure standards that are protective of health, especially for children and pregnant women.

We, our children, and all living beings depend on us and on governments around the globe to protect health and safety and to place these above all else.

Resources on health:

International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
Clear Evidence of the Risks to Children from Non-Ionizing Radio Frequency Radiation
Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA) 
Physicians for Safe Technology
Environmental Health Trust Science
Scientific Studies: Biological effects of RF radiation

Many animals and plants depend on Earth’s magnetic field for navigation, breeding, food, migration and indeed their very survival. Recently reported research shows current levels of artificial radiation interfere with these biological processes.

Biologists have discovered that wireless electromagnetic radiation disturbs internal magneto-receptors used for navigation, as well as disrupting other complex cellular and biologic processes in mammals, birds, fish, insects, trees, plants, seeds and bacteria with profound impacts on the natural environment.

Cindy Russell, Physicians For Safe Technology.

The unique sensitivity of different species to electromagnetic radiation is both understudied and under-regulated. Blake Levitt et al write in the abstract to part 2 of their 3-part opus on the effects of EMR on flora and fauna:

Wildlife loss is often unseen and undocumented until tipping points are reached. It is time to recognize ambient EMF as a novel form of pollution and develop rules at regulatory agencies that designate air as ‘habitat’ so EMF can be regulated like other pollutants. Long-term chronic low-level EMF exposure standards, which do not now exist, should be set accordingly for wildlife, and environmental laws should be strictly enforced.

The Effects of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Fields on Flora and Fauna (Part 2)

Radiation has been implicated in Colony Collapse Disorder. The shorter millimeter wave frequencies used for 5G will be yet more perilous than 2G, 3G, and 4G as insects are millimeter-sized creatures and will selectively absorb and amplify these frequencies.

We interfere with nature at our own peril.

For more info, please visit Environmental Trust’s newest website Wildlife, Wireless and the Environment.

Resources on Wildlife:

Biological effects of electromagnetic fields on insects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3.
Electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation.
Environment and Wildlife Effects
Electromagnetic radiation as an emerging driver factor for the decline of insects
Published Research on the Adverse Effect of Wireless Technology and Electromagnetic Radiation on Bees
Electromagnetic Pollution Risks to Bees
Letter from Dr. Devra Davis re Telecommunications Infrastructure Plan at Grand Teton National Park
Science: Plant and Animal Electromagnetic Sensitivity
Electromagnetic Fields, Tree & Plant Growth
Review – Biological effects of electromagnetic fields on insects Biological effects of electromagnetic fields on insects
A review of the ecological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)
Review: Weak radiofrequency radiation exposure from mobile phone radiation on plants
5G-The Digital Killing Fields-EMF/EMR

Technology has non consensually rendered the right to privacy and autonomy a relic of the past.

Enabled by millions of new 5G antennas, cellphones, the internet of things (IoT), smart cities, satellite communications and imaging, cameras, sensors, facial recognition technology etc., our digitally connected world generates a vast amount of data. This data, which is arguably the primary reason for our increasingly digitally interconnected world, provides the fodder for AI enabling: targeted marketing, surveillance, manipulation, research, war as well as countless other applications, both beneficial and harmful.

Aggregated and sifted through, our data provides granular details about where we have been, where we are headed, what we are doing, and what our interests and means are. As users of technology, tethered to cellphones we have allowed ourselves to become commoditized by Big Tech, whose business model relies largely on an income stream generated from our data.

As Surveillance Capitalism expert Shoshana Zuboff explains,

They [businesses] want to know how we will behave in order to know how to best intervene in our behaviour.

Shoshana Zuboff: ‘Surveillance capitalism is an assault on human autonomy’

Our data (including faces and other biometric markers which are increasingly being used as identifiers) are collected, analyzed, aggregated and stored indefinitely in data centers. The data is sold and used for surveillance, targeted marketing (aka surveillance capitalism), law enforcement, research, smart city systems, war. and more as the IoT evolves. In fact, a whole interconnected system is being built as data from one application provides fodder for another.

Our children are not exempt from data-harvesting. According to research conducted by Super Awesome, by the time a child reaches the age of thirteen, ad companies will have collected about 72 million data points on that child. (NB: That research was published in 2017; we can only imagine how many data points on our children are being collected in 2024.)

Resources on Privacy
Shoshana Zuboff on Surveillance Capitalism (VPRO documentary)
The Terrifying Potential of the 5G Network
How much info is Google getting from your phone? [VIDEO]
Smile, Your City Is Watching You
Security and Privacy in the World-Sized Web
A New Satellite Can Peer Inside Some Buildings, Day or Night But don’t worry — the company says it can’t see inside your home
O.K., Google: How Much Money Have I Made for You Today…
Report: Without safeguards, Internet and IoT may create surveillance states in near future

It is becoming ever clearer that a technologized world, even coupled with so-called “renewable energy”, will not succeed in offsetting its own fast growing and unbounded energy footprint. Armed with an astronomical amount of data generated from the 5G-enabled Internet of Things (IoT), smart cities, smart regions, and now AI, the pitch is we will be better equipped to save energy. But what most analyses fail to include is the mega energy footprint of all these internet-connected things humming and buzzing 24/7.

Not considered in the murky estimates proffered about energy consumption from technology are:

  • The extraordinary amount of energy and water required to power data centers – the “cloud”.
  • The energy consumed by all the ever-communicating “things” machines, cellphones, towers, applications, sensors, cameras, and so forth.
  • The energy needed to manufacture all this technology and accompanying infrastructure (aka embodied energy).
  • The CO2 released into the atmosphere from powering all these radiating sources.
  • The excess energy needed to move data wirelessly through the air rather than more efficiently and effectively through wired connections.
  • The excess energy needed for video streaming and conferencing.
  • The energy required for global travel to assemble devices as the parts of any given technology come from around the world (c.500,000 miles of travel for one iPhone)

AI is only adding to the predicament. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google all made promises of net zero data centers by 2025 they must now renege on as AI is far more energy consumptive than ever imagined. One Chat GPT search uses approximately 10 times more energy than a Google search.

An all-things-connected world with AI layered on top is not the answer to saving energy. Wise and judicious use of mostly wired technology in conjunction with specific applications for AI that are actually beneficial to society, would go a long way toward solving the energy crisis. But most effective for saving energy and achieving true well-being would be for humans to spend more time inhabiting the real world where far less exogenous energy is needed.

Resources on Energy
Letters about nature and technology
An avalanche of green reports won’t cool the climate
Who can trust industry claims about 5G’s sustainability?

How green is 5G?With data centres set to have a bigger carbon footprint than the whole aviation industry, smart technology’s benefits need urgent re-examination.
Radiation Analysis in a Gradual 5G Network Deployment Strategy
French study finds 5G increases risk to climate. Deployment of the new mobile internet technology is likely to cause a ‘significant increase’ in greenhouse gas emissions, an independent climate council has foundWhat Will 5G Mean for the Environment?
Assessing ICT global emissions footprint: Trends to 2040 & recommendations
Energy Consumption in Wired and Wireless Access Networks
5G base stations use a lot more energy than 4G base stations: MTN
Turn Off That Camera During Virtual Meetings Environmental Study Says
Proposing Cradle-to-Grave Evaluations for ALL New Vehicles
Your iPhone’s 500,000-Mile Journey to Your Pocket

Research shows technology has profound psycho-social effects on us all, but particularly on children. These effects include loneliness, developmental delay, anxiety, ADHD, addiction, anxiety, depression, aggression, sleep deprivation, memory loss, obesity, suicidal ideation, and suicide. According to Professor Jean Twenge from San Diego State University, “Young people are on the brink of the worst mental health crisis in decades.”

Tech-addiction is on the rise. The average teenager is online about nine hours per day, and Screen Strong tells us the average child spends over 52 hours a week in front of a screen. Gaming Disorder is now included in the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11).

A new study published in the journal of JAMA Pediatrics found that early childhood use of tablets resulted in more outbursts of anger and frustration a year later. These outbursts were then associated with more use of tablets yet another year later, potentially contributing to a cycle of emotional dysregulation.

Nicolas Kardaras, author of Glow Kids writes,

…recent brain imaging studies conclusively show that excessive screen exposure can neurologically damage a young person’s developing brain in the same way that drug addiction can.

He goes on to state,

Brain imaging research shows that stimulating glowing screens are as dopaminergic – dopamine-activating – to the brain’s pleasure center as sex.

We have allowed our children to be manipulated by shrewedly derived algorithms that profit big tech while leaving families in wreckage, and the fabric of our society languishing. Our kids desperately need more time away from technology and screens to better connect with family, friends, and the natural world.

As our world becomes ever more digitalized, the problem of dependence on and addiction to technology will only worsen. The public needs to become informed about the harms; Big Tech must be better regulated; and we must all strive for a culture of moderation and balance in our use of technology.

The time is long over-due for family, friends, and community to reassume their rightful place at the helm of mentoring and guiding future generations.

And whenever possible, advocate for safe learning environments that involve minimal exposure to screens as well and wireless radiation!!

Please consider signing The Declaration on the Human Rights of Children in the Digital Age.

Resources on Brains and Humanity
Dr. Nicolas Kardaras Website on Tech Addiction
Tech Overuse & Addiction – “Books and Other Resources”
Eliminating the Human
I asked my students to turn in their cell phones and write about living without them. Here’s what they had to say.

With ever new iterations of technology joining the growing ranks of electronic waste (e-waste) will Earth be able to “digest” this fast-growing volume of discarded stuff? Can recycling keep pace? And is there an end in sight for the horrendous conditions of the people tasked with processing much of the world’s e-waste?

In 2022, world wide, we generated 62 million metric tons of e-waste, and that number is projected to reach 82 million by 2030.

Although there are better ways to recycle used stuff, most of our e-waste either goes to landfills or is shipped to Africa or Asia where it is disassembled by people working and living in extremely dire conditions. Laborers (some as young as 10 years old) eek out a meager living salvaging scraps of copper, aluminum, lead or whatever materials have value and/or can be reused.

Fire is used to separate the plastic coating from the copper wires. “Burners”, the title given to men tasked with this dirtiest of jobs, are exposed to highly toxic fumes which are harmful not only to them, but also to the surrounding flora and fauna, air, water, crops, and earth. To get a sense of the downstream effects of our discarded stuff, check out these excellent and poignant videos documenting the squalor:
Ghana: A Week in a Toxic Waste Dump
E-Waste Is Poisoning Malaysia And Thailand – What Can Be Done? 
The World’s Junkyard for Electronic Scrap | Digital Dumping in Ghana
The tragic costs of e-waste

Causes for E-Waste

There are a number of reasons why we generate so much e-waste. Planned obsolescence is a business model where products are designed to have a short life span and not be easily repaired resulting in people having to discard “old” gadgets and buy new ones. Another reason for so much e-waste is that appliances not connected to the internet often last 20-30 years, but newer IoT appliances have a far shorter life span as “more complexity means more can go wrong” (Your fridge isn’t built to last. Here’s why | The Washington Post). Furthermore, due to manufacturers not updating the software, IoT appliances are often left open to hacking and may no longer be safe to use. And finally, perhaps the biggest contributing factor is our 21st century’s civilization’s obsession with ever more, newer, bigger, and faster – so-called “progress”

E-Waste from Manufacturing

As overwhelming as our post comsumer e-waste is, discarded “stuff” contributes to only about 2-3% of all e-waste. A far more significant contributor is the release of toxins from the mining and manufacturing of electronics – i.e. the resource extraction, manufacturing, transportation and electricity needed before a gadget is even used. Josh Lepawsky explains:

…about 3.1 million metric tons of e-waste was collected from households in the European Union. Yet five times more waste, 16.2 million metric tons, arose from electronics manufacturing within the EU. This means that even if all household e-waste collected in the EU is recycled, waste from manufacturing electronics in the same region far outstrips the scale of household e-waste.

Almost everything you know about e-waste is wrong,

Ways to help

  1. Use tech devices and appliances sparingly
  2. Only purchase essential digital products and take good care of them to extend their lifespan.
  3. Repair whenever possible, and lobby for “right to repair” laws in your state. (Thankfully, small repair shops are appearing more and more.)
  4. Become informed and lobby policy makers to help regulate mining for rare earths and manufacturing of digital products.
  5. Best to not use a cellphone at all. But if you absolutely must, and your current phone cannot be repaired, consider buying a Fair Phone.

Abbreviated list of items destined for e-waste stream:

  • cell towers
  • satellites 
  • smart phones, cordless phones, computers, TVs and chargers
  • the Internet of Things (including nearly every “thing” that can be connected to the internet) 
  • WiFi routers 
  • solar panels, electric vehicles, and batteries
  • farming equipment and robots for precision agriculture et al
  • quantum computers
  • weapons of war
  • drones, spyware, and devices and infrastrucutre for surveillance and reconnaissance
  • robots
  • smart meters and attendant technology
  • e-bikes, scooters, toys, clothing
  • surveillance cameras and sensors throughout cities
  • computers supporting data centers and the cloud
  • tracking devices on wildlife and farm animals
  • microwave ovens
  • gaming consoles
  • an ocean full of sensors
  • underwater unmanned vehicles, robots etc. 

“They’re digging in trenches and laboring in lakes, hunting for treasure in a playground from Hell. Hard enough for an adult man. Unthinkable for a child.”
CBS News finds children mining cobalt for batteries in the Congo.

Like bookends propping up a centuries long story of colonization, resource extraction, and war, veiled by notions of convenience and promises of tech “progress-topia,” people are slaving away mining for minerals and dismantling e-waste so the story can persist. A new story is long overdue – one of satiety and inter-being that benefits all living beings and Mother Earth. 

Rare earth elements (REE), aka rare metals (RM) or alloys are used in nearly all our technology and batteries. With the push to connect every “thing” possible to the internet and the rapid move to AI and so-called “renewables” the need for more of these elements is expected to grow. Rare earth elements are foundational for the war industry for infrastructure, batteries, weapons, and communications on land, in space and in the sea.

Though these rare earth elements are abundant in many countries, what makes them “rare” is that only a tiny fraction can be extracted from a given sample of earth.

Once the REEs are extracted, they are taken to refineries for smeltering, and then shipped to technology manufacturing facilities, batteries et al, and then once assembled, the products are transported to market. Each step of this process is fossil fuel intensive.

Additionally, both mining and refining introduce large amounts of toxins into the air, water, crops, and soil nearby, and impact the health of miners, farmers, and wildlife.

The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) sits on 24 trillion dollars of resources for which the global north is clamoring. The DRC has been at the heart of the global rush to extract these minerals through both industrial (presumably slightly better working conditions) or artisinal (make-shift) mining. Being an unstable country for centuries due to prior colonialism it is prone to corruption and human rights abuses both from within and without.

The production of our electronic technologies has fueled war, murder, rape, and child labor in the DRC. According to World Without Genocide at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, approximately 6 million people have died as a result of conflicts fueled by the pursuit of rare earth minerals needed for our electronics. Hundreds of thousands of women have been raped and sold back to villages for ransom, and Unicef estimated that in 2016, there were about 40,000 children working in mines across the Congo.

Murky supply chains mix the artisanally mined cobalt with industry cobalt to keep the costs down and profits up. The only change now is the virtue signaling of companies to the contrary with websites that now host sections on “sustainable practices” and “community building” to placate public conscience for being complicit. With the push toward AI and “renewables”, the situation is becoming yet more dire.  

About 20% of mines in the DRC are artisanal, meaning make-shift operations, while the remainder are industry operations and the working conditions slightly less harsh and the pay fairer. But unfortunately, that’s not always the case. Murky supply chains mix the artisanally mined cobalt with the industry cobalt to keep the costs down and profits up.

Human ramifications are two fold:

1) miners in the DRC, including young children, slave away to extract cobolt, copper, nickel and coltan under extremely hazardous conditions and are paid pittance.

2) Geopolitical tensions are on the rise as the US tries to play “catch up” with China which has captured 73% of the global supply chain of rare earths.

The current push for electric vehicles (each of which requires 20 pounds of cobalt), “renewables”, AI and an all-things-connected world will likely bring more hardship, child labor, and death while continuing to ravage the Earth.

Other sources

REEs are also found abundantly on the seabed as well as on the moon and asteroids. Access to ocean minerals depends on the ratification of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, aka High Seas Treaty, by the International Seabed Authority which is currently in process. The environmental impacts of deep sea mining are an unknown and in the words of David Attenborough

The rush to mine this pristine and unexplored environment risks creating terrible impacts that cannot be reversed. 

For more on mining asteroids, check out Conflicts with Asteroid Mining by the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space.

Technology is both an exponentializer and accelerator. When added to other systems it increases their scope, velocity, and impact. Due largely to the multipying effect of technology, we have a new term to describe our current state of affairs: the Metacrisis  aka the Polycrisis – The multiple and interconnected global crises we now face. Layering tech and AI onto a civilization that worships progress at all costs, and that sees itself as separate from the natural world, now threatens all living systems.

Jevons Paradox posits that every invention that increases efficiency, simultaneously increases demand for the product, service, or technology. Given we’re already stretching the limits of Earth’s bounty, with the addition of the exponentializing effects of tech and AI coupled with Jevons Paradox, we are on a collision course with Mother Earth.

With wisdom and the utmost intention and restraint, perhaps, we could maximize the benefits while avoiding the harms. But unfortunately, that’s not likely to happen until our civilization pivots to a more values-based trajectory.

“With the advent of the Internet of Things and cyber-physical systems in general, we’ve given the Internet hands and feet: the ability to directly affect the physical world. What used to be attacks against data and information have become attacks against flesh, steel, and concrete.”  Restated:
Give the Internet hands and feet, and it will have the ability to punch and kick.” – Bruce Schneier

Our internet-connected world offers a grab-bag of possibilities for cyber attacks and cyber warfare.  

Cyber attacks occur when an attacker takes control of, alters, or damages computers or computer-controlled systems such as water or electric grids, hospitals, banking systems, transportation, etc.

The increase in the number, sophistication, and potential damage caused by cyber attacks is directly related to the exponential increase in technology and the widespread adoption of AI. AI allows hackers to scan large bodies of data for vulnerabilities, and to use sham content and deep fakes to deceive their target.

Predictions vary, but according to Technology.Org, in 2024, the global cost of cyber attacks will total $10.5 trillion USD, and by the end of 2027, $23.84 trillion USD.

With a global system entirely predicated on technology and AI, the impacts of a single cyber attack could cause untold misery and death to many.

For more on cyber warfare, see https://safetechinternational.org/tech-and-the-military/

Wireless systems are far more easily hacked than wired connections. With so many IoT things and devices as well as cameras and sensors peppered throughout homes and cities, there are trillions of entry points for our data to be used by hackers for their purposes.

Cell towers and other telecommunications infrastructure can cause fires which cannot be extinguished by conventional fire fighting protocols. Electricity to a burning tower needs to be cut before applying water or firefighters risk electrocution. De-energizing a tower can take up to 60 minutes during which time firefighters can only maintain the perimeter around the cell tower and keep people away from the tower. High winds may also increase the opportunity for spread, causing an out-of-control wildfire with loss of property, life and wildlife.

Wireless smart meters pose serious fire risks as well. 

Although there are some documented cases of arson, the primary cause of cell tower fires is electrical malfunction and or sparks emitted from welding during routine maintenance or when adding equipment to a tower.  

There are no official records of the number and frequency of cell tower fires. The only records we do have are by David Stupin, a retired physicist who tracked tower fires in the US until 2015. According to his estimates, approximately one tower fire occurred monthly in the US. With 5G and the proliferation of cell towers since 2015, we can presume the number of fires has increased significantly. 

Wired connections such as fiber or copper are far safer as they are not a source of heat nor do they ignite easily.

Fire safety can join the growing list of reasons of why wired connections are far superior to wireless: Healthier, more cyber secure, far more energy efficient, faster, more resilient, less suited for tracking hacking and surveillance, and significantly lower risk of fire. 

Telecoms admit they do not know if their wireless technology is safe. They warn shareholders that revenues could be negatively impacted by health claims. Neither will insurance companies insure telecoms against liability for exposure-related health claims.

Who will be held liable in the event of harm from a wireless “small cell” facility? Who will assume financial responsibility for future injury, fire, loss of health, property devaluation etc. due to close proximity of cell antennas to homes, workplaces, and schools?

Resources on Liability
Environmental Health Trust on Liability
Cell Phones Wireless Companies Warn Shareholders About Future Financial Risks From Electromagnetic Radiation

Cell towers fail to hold up under disaster conditions. They failed in the fires in California as well as in the hurricanes in Puerto Rico and Texas.

The Wall Street Journal reported, “Wireless networks along the Texas coast suffered outages as a result of Hurricane Harvey, federal regulators said, leaving customers in some counties with limited or no cellphone service.”

Wired technologies such as copper, coaxial and fiber are vastly more resilient than cell towers.

Resources on Resilience
Presently, Over 86% of Cell Sites in Puerto Rico Are Still Not Operating in Aftermath of Hurricane Maria
Cell Networks Suffer Outages in Harvey’s Wake Customers have limited or no cellphone service; three Texas counties are hardest hit

There are Safer Alternatives

There are safer and more reliable ways to connect to the internet that have been around for over 25 years: wired connections such as fiber or copper. If we used wired connections for the vast majority of internet and telecommunications needs, reserving wireless for an ancillary service where truly necessary and where wired is not possible, we could enjoy the benefits of technology while minimizing the harms and surveillance.

Wired technologies such as fiber or coaxial cable are faster, more reliable, resilient, energy-efficient, less prone to cyber attacks, surveillance, and other privacy violations. Above all, wired technologies are significantly less hazardous to our health and would better ensure the survival of other life forms with whom we share this beloved planet we call home.

Resources on Wired Technology
Re-Inventing Wires:The Future of Landlines and Networks 
Connected Communities
The drive to widen the digital divide
Wired vs Wireless Network